Why passive preferred ETFs miss market opportunities

Why passive preferred ETFs miss market opportunities

Why passive preferred ETFs miss market opportunities

16 minute read

April 2025

Share

Sign up to get our insights
Subscribe

The market has evolved considerably, but passive ETFs have not adapted. We believe active strategies that invest across the entire market are a better solution.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • The indexes that passive ETFs track fall short of representing the preferreds universe, limiting potential returns.
  • Active strategies provide access to the broad preferred market, enhancing diversification and risk management while capturing varied income sources.
  • Active managers can potentially further add value by leveraging significant differences across preferred markets, security structures and quality.

Investors’ desire for income has led to increased interest in preferred securities, which offer attractive (often tax-advantaged) income from high-quality issuers. However, as investors look to access this dynamic market, we believe passive exchange-traded funds (ETFs), while popular, are fundamentally flawed.

A closer look at some of the largest passive ETFs (representing approximately 45% of the category’s total assets) indicate the challenges investors face when selecting passive over active. Most of these passive funds are concentrated in exchange-traded preferreds, a small (and shrinking) share of the preferreds market. They largely ignore two significant parts of the market—over-the- counter (OTC) preferred and contingent capital securities (CoCos) (Exhibit 1).

Four of the largest five passive funds have no allocations to OTC preferreds. None of the five include CoCos, which are high-yielding securities widely issued by financial institutions outside of the U.S. to meet capital requirements. CoCos have been the fastest-growing preferreds segment and now compose nearly a quarter of the market (up from just 2% in 2011).

EXHIBIT 1
Most passive ETFs disregard the largest preferreds opportunity sets

Allocations by preferred security category for popular passive ETFs

Most passive ETFs disregard the largest preferreds opportunity sets

Why markets matter

Preferred securities are available in a variety of structures, including fixed-rate, resettable-rate and floating-rate coupons, which results in a wide range of security duration (i.e., interest rate sensitivity). Generally, a higher duration leads to a greater price change in response to a given change in the security’s yield—an unattractive feature in rising-rate environments.

Fixed-rate perpetual securities dominate the exchange-traded $25 par preferreds market. Consequently, the duration profiles of passive ETFs (which mainly track the exchange-traded market) tend to be much higher than the average durations of funds with more OTC exposure, where most securities have coupons that periodically adjust. The exchange-traded market also currently offers the lowest average yields in the preferreds market (Exhibit 2). Yields (and credit spreads) are generally more attractive in the OTC market today.

Global preferred securities (excluding CoCos), denominated in currencies other than the dollar, are one preferred variety overlooked by passive ETFs. These securities primarily trade in the OTC market and represent approximately 30% of global preferreds. Similar to their U.S. dollar counterparts, these securities typically have fixed-to-reset coupon structures and long or perpetual maturities. Coupon payments can be deferred without triggering an event of default; however, they typically cannot be omitted and must be repaid prior to maturity or redemption.

CoCos are also unavailable to most passive ETFs. These OTC-traded fixed-to-reset securities will write down or convert to common stock in the event that the issuer’s capital level falls below a particular threshold or if the bank reaches a point of nonviability. However, such write-downs are rare, and CoCos typically offer excess compensation in the form of higher yields relative to other parts of the preferreds market and other fixed income segments.

EXHIBIT 2
OTC and CoCos markets offer opportunities unavailable to most ETFs

Composition of the preferreds market

OTC and CoCos markets offer opportunities unavailable to most ETFs

Not all benchmarks are created equal

With most passive ETFs linked to exchange-traded benchmarks, their holdings are primarily in U.S. retail securities. Yet issuers outside the U.S. account for two-thirds of the $1.3 trillion preferred securities market, and 44% of securities are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.

Our active ETF benchmark, the ICE Large Cap Capital Securities Index – USD Hedged, reflects the broad global universe (Exhibit 3). We believe this benchmark best represents how the preferreds universe has evolved, with the greatest growth coming from the institutional U.S. and non–U.S. dollar markets.

The broad universe provides diversification at the sector, issuer and geographic levels that is not available elsewhere. It also includes securities with resetting coupon structures and foreign currency–denominated issues that can be used to manage credit and interest rate risk. Although the index is global in scope, investors are not exposed to currency risk, to the extent non–U.S. dollar securities are passively hedged to the U.S. dollar.

EXHIBIT 3
We believe we have created a benchmark superior to those employed by passive ETFs

Preferreds benchmark comparison

We believe we have created a benchmark superior to those employed by passive ETFs

Sign up to get our insights delivered to your inbox

Opportunities emerge from return differences across markets

Performance among preferreds can vary significantly by market segment (Exhibit 4). Several factors—including the diverse range of security types, rate structures, credit risks, geographies, and currencies within the preferreds market—drive this dispersion. We believe this return variability offers active managers an opportunity to generate excess returns that passive strategies often miss.

Access to the entire global preferreds universe is crucial, in our opinion. This includes CoCos and global preferred securities (ex-CoCos), which have consistently been among the top-performing categories in the last 10 years.

EXHIBIT 4
Active managers can capitalize across segments of the preferreds market

Annual returns ranked from best to worst (%)

Active managers can capitalize across segments of the preferreds market

The full market holds the potential for superior long-term returns

The benefits of a broad approach to investing in the preferreds market are evident in Exhibit 5. Over the past decade, the broad market has outperformed the various preferreds segments, particularly the exchange- traded portion.

Active managers harnessing the full market breadth may enhance returns in a variety of ways, such as:

  • Diversifying across interest rate regimes by investing in foreign currency–denominated securities
  • By conducting in-depth credit analysis
  • Identifying pricing inefficiencies
  • Leveraging distinct duration and callability features across security structures.
EXHIBIT 5
A broad market approach has historically been the most powerful strategy

Broad market benchmark vs. preferred securities categories (2015–2024)

A broad market approach has historically been the most powerful strategy

Conclusion

We believe flaws in benchmark construction and inefficiencies in preferred securities markets make active management a better option than passive investment strategies. Most passive preferred ETFs track the performance of the small (and dwindling) exchange-traded segment of the market, which has generated weak performance in the past decade.

An active approach, unconstrained by the limits of this small market segment and free to pursue securities based on relative value, offers the potential for meaningful excess returns. For instance, based on Morningstar data as of December 31, 2024, over the trailing three, five and ten years, 92%, 86%, and 91% of active preferred securities funds outperformed the typical passive preferred fund, with average annual excess returns of 2.03%, 1.69%, and 1.26%, respectively.(1)

In our view, the ability to invest across the large, global universe is essential, given that performance across security types varies year to year (and by rate environment). By adjusting allocations based on credit quality and spreads, operating in both the retail (exchange-traded) and institutional (OTC markets), and using derivatives for hedging, active managers have powerful tools at their disposal to generate alpha.

Investment characteristics

FURTHER READING

Five reasons to consider preferred securities if you own municipal bonds

Five reasons to consider preferred securities if you own municipal bonds

May 2025 | 10 mins

With many investors feeling the sting of taxes, municipal bonds aren’t the only option for tax-advantaged income. Preferred securities currently offer among the highest after-tax yields in fixed income, regardless of tax bracket.

Tariffs, volatility and the opportunity in preferred securities

Tariffs, volatility and the opportunity in preferred securities

April 2025 | 3 mins

In a market shaped by tariffs and volatility, we explore how preferred securities are holding up—and where we see opportunity ahead.

Why preferreds and high yield make a great pair

April 2025 | 10 mins

With many investors turning to riskier bonds for yield, diversification is key. Pairing high-yield bonds with preferreds, which have attractive yields and distinct characteristics, may complement traditional fixed income holdings.

4430059