Investors have increasingly viewed energy through an either/or lens, taking a zero-sum view, and limiting their investments to traditional or alternative energy forms. This is a flawed approach.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- Most of today’s investment options take a zero-sum view of energy and limit their investment universes to either traditional or alternative energy investments. We think this is a flawed approach.
- We believe a fundamental investment strategy that recognizes the reality of the world’s energy demands and blends traditional with alternative sources offers improved risk adjusted returns.
- We expect winners and losers across both traditional and alternative energy. Consequently, we feel this sector is ripe for active management, as investors need to sidestep poor performing companies while zeroing in on secular winners.
Today’s energy landscape
Energy investors have been forced to take an either/or approach to investing, as the existing suite of investment strategies limits their investment choice to either traditional or alternative energy companies. We believe this is a flawed approach.
Such a binary view does not reflect the reality we see for the future of energy. Population and economic growth will drive increasing global energy consumption through 2040 and beyond, even after factoring in improving energy efficiency.
To meet this growing demand, the marketplace is expected to need all the reliable energy it can generate. We see significant growth coming from alternative energy, but the majority of the energy supply will still come from traditional. Because of this we believe the future of energy is really more of an “energy addition” story.
You can read more on this topic in our recently released paper: Changing the narrative from ‘energy transition’ to ‘energy addition.’
Flaws of current strategies
We believe there are inherent flaws in the existing strategies offering exposure to energy markets—namely, they tend to track only traditional energy or alternative energy benchmarks. These strategies are not adapting to the reality of the energy future.
For instance, the largest index to track traditional energy markets is the S&P Energy Select Sector Index. This index only offers exposure to companies focused on traditional energy, as determined by the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) for the sector, which is limited to energy equipment and services alongside oil, gas and consumable fuels. Further, we observe that the largest three stocks in the index make up nearly 50% of the total index by weight, and this concentration has increased from 37% in 2014. We have also seen the number of index constituents decline from 43 to 23 over the same period (Exhibit 1).
Put simply, the S&P Energy Select Sector Index is highly concentrated and only represents legacy traditional energy businesses. Though many traditional energy companies are investing capital in alternative technologies, the exposure to alternatives in the index is not representative of where we see the future going.
EXHIBIT 1
Largest traditional index dominated by three companies
At December 31, 2023. Source: State Street Global Advisors.
By comparison, many alternative energy markets are tracked by the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, which is used as a benchmark by many strategies that investors utilize to access the space. While we are optimistic about technological innovation and the significant growth ahead for alternative energy, we believe the flaw is that this universe is highly volatile and can often be dependent on factors such as technological success and government policy/tax incentives, which can be less predictable. Further, the future is not “all renewable” in our view of the “energy addition” world to come.
Alternative energy is the segment of the industry with the most robust growth outlook. However, not all technologies will be successful, as unit costs, consumer preferences and tax policies can have an outsized influence on outcomes. Passive indexes are by definition inclusive of a broad array of technologies, giving investors exposure not just to the best companies of the future, but also the structural losers. This can weigh substantially on returns.
A blended approach reflects the reality of the energy future
We believe combining traditional forms of energy, such as crude oil and natural gas, with alternative energy forms, such as wind and solar, can create better investment outcomes. This is because a blended approach smooths returns as technological advancements and government policy ebb and flow (Exhibit 2).
More specifically, we project traditional resources will generate ~70% of global energy supply by market share by 2034, with alternatives making up the remaining ~30%. This acknowledges that traditional energy will play a key role for decades to come, while recognizing that alternative energy will also play a meaningful role and one that will grow with time.
With this in mind, we created a blended index comprising 70% traditional energy and 30% alternatives, which yielded more attractive absolute returns when compared with either individual strategy. Annualized volatility also fell when the two forms of energy were blended—the combination of which helped smooth returns.
We believe that making a dynamic allocation to both traditional and alternative energy will maximize opportunities across the energy value chain while providing exposure to the ongoing evolution of energy markets.
EXHIBIT 2
Historically higher returns, lower risk
Blended approach is poised to provide strong returns with less risk
At January 31, 2024. Source: Morningstar
Data quoted represents past performance, which is no guarantee of future results. TThe information presented above does not reflect the performance of any fund or other account managed or serviced by Cohen & Steers, and there is no guarantee that investors will experience the type of performance reflected above. The index blend represented above is not reflective of an investment strategy employed by an active investment manager. The illustrative index blend is provided for reference purposes of historical sector level performance only. 70/30 index blend composed of 70% traditional energy (represented by S&P Energy Select Sector Index) and 30% alternative energy (represented by S&P Global Clean Energy Index). (1) Traditional Energy represented by S&P Energy Select Sector Index; (2) Alternative Energy represented by S&P Global Clean Energy Index; (3) Index blend represented by 70% S&P Energy Select Sector Index and 30% S&P Global Clean Energy Index.
Why active management?
We believe investors need to redefine what the energy market is—away from a zero-sum ideology to a broader universe. A high-conviction, actively managed approach that includes both traditional and alternative companies offers broader exposure and more accurately represents what the future of energy will look like, in our view.
The disparity between the winners and losers within energy indexes is great, reflecting the rapidly evolving industry, and also the relative uncertainty in energy investing. A closer look at the indexes illustrates this.
The average return of the top 10 holdings within the ETF that tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy Index was +311% over the five-year period ending December 31, 2023, while the average return of the bottom 10 holdings was -83%.
Within the ETF that tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector Index, the average return of the top 10 holdings was +141% over the same five-year period, while the average return of the bottom 10 holdings was -31%.
By investing in an active strategy, investors can be better positioned, in our view, to sidestep poorly performing companies.
We believe an investment approach that pairs traditional and alternative energy through an active strategy will create superior investment outcomes. Focusing only on traditional or alternative fails to provide an accurate representation of current and future energy markets.
Winners and losers across the energy landscape
Case for active management
FURTHER READING
3 Reasons to own global listed infrastructure today
Attractive valuations, an advantageous macro environment and high private investor interest set the stage for potentially strong total returns from listed infrastructure.
Investing in the future of energy
Global energy demand is poised for substantial growth in the coming decades, which is creating attractive investment opportunities across the alternative energy landscape and the traditional energy value chain.
Changing the narrative from ‘energy transition’ to ‘energy addition’
Aggregate energy demand will continue to increase in the coming decades, which is creating attractive investment opportunities across both the traditional and alternative energy landscape.
Index definitions / important disclosures
An investor cannot invest directly in an index and index performance does not reflect the deduction of any fees, expenses or taxes. S&P Energy Select Sector Index seeks to provide a representation of the energy sector of the S&P 500 Index. The Index includes companies from the following industries: oil, gas and consumable fuels; and energy equipment and services. S&P Global Clean Energy Index measures the performance of 30 largest companies in global clean energy related businesses from both developed and emerging markets.
Data quoted represents past performance, which is no guarantee of future results. This material is for informational purposes and reflects prevailing conditions and our judgment as of this date, which are subject to change. There is no guarantee that any market forecast set forth in this presentation will be realized. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific point in time and should not be relied upon as investment advice, does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell a security or other investment and is not intended to predict or depict performance of any investment.
This material is not being provided in a fiduciary capacity and is not intended to recommend any investment policy or investment strategy or take into account the specific objectives or circumstances of any investor. We consider the information in this presentation to be accurate, but we do not represent that it is complete or should be relied upon as the sole source of appropriateness for investment. Please consult with your investment, tax or legal professional regarding your individual circumstances prior to investing.
Active management does not ensure a profit or guarantee to protect against a loss and actively managed strategies may underperform passively managed strategies.
Risks of Investing in Energy: Investing involves risk, including entire loss of capital invested. There can be no assurance that the investment strategy will meet its investment objectives. Diversification is not guaranteed to ensure a profit or protect against loss. The portfolio will be subject to more risks related to the energy sector than if the portfolio were more broadly diversified over numerous sectors of the economy. A downturn in the energy sector of the economy could have a larger impact on the portfolio than on an investment company that does not concentrate in the sector. Investments within the energy industry may be highly volatile due to significant fluctuation in the prices of energy commodities as well as political and regulatory developments.
Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. (Cohen & Steers) is a U.S. registered investment advisory firm that provides investment management services to corporate retirement, public and union retirement plans, endowments, foundations and mutual funds. Cohen & Steers U.S. registered open-end funds are distributed by Cohen & Steers Securities, LLC and are only available to U.S. residents. Cohen & Steers Asia Limited is authorized and regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong (ALZ367). Cohen & Steers Japan Limited is a registered financial instruments operator (investment advisory and agency business and discretionary investment management business with the Financial Services Agency of Japan and the Kanto Local Finance Bureau No. 3157) and is a member of the Japan Investment Advisers Association. Cohen & Steers UK Limited is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FRN458459). Cohen & Steers Ireland Limited is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland (No.C188319). Cohen & Steers Singapore Private Limited is a private company limited by shares in the Republic of Singapore.
For recipients in the Middle East: This document is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute or form part of any marketing initiative, any offer to issue or sell, or any solicitation of any offer to subscribe or purchase, any products, strategies or other services, nor shall it or the fact of its distribution form the basis of, or be relied on in connection with, any contract resulting therefrom. In the event that the recipient of this document wishes to receive further information with regard to any products, strategies or other services, it shall specifically request the same in writing from us.