Utilities, midstream energy and nuclear power are poised to benefit from growth in data centers, manufacturing and the electrification of the economy.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- Drivers of power demand
Population growth, data processing led by artificial intelligence (AI), precision manufacturing, and the electrification of the economy will drive power demand growth not seen in a generation. - Implications for infrastructure
Accelerating electricity demand will have significant implications for listed infrastructure, and we see several infrastructure businesses focused on this theme. - Focus on utilities, midstream energy, nuclear power
We believe independent power producers and integrated utilities are the main beneficiaries, while data centers’ need for reliable energy should create opportunities for midstream energy companies that own and operate natural gas pipelines.
The world needs more electricity
We believe that population growth, data processing led by artificial intelligence (AI), precision manufacturing, and the electrification of the economy will drive power demand growth not seen in a generation. This phenomenon is creating both substantial opportunities and potential challenges for listed infrastructure companies.
While power demand in the United States has been largely flat for nearly two decades, this trend is now reversing. We expect overall power demand to grow ~2.5% per year, on average, through 2030 (Exhibit 1). Some utilities are expected to see demand growth above 5%.
EXHIBIT 1
Back to the ‘80s: Power demand to climb
Avg. annual growth (%)

As of August 31, 2024. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Cohen & Steers
There are three notable drivers of higher electricity needs:
- Data centers that support AI applications
- Precision manufacturing
- Electrification
We believe that many investors fail to appreciate the fact that there will be both winners and potential losers in a world of higher power demand.
We believe there will be opportunities for utilities, midstream energy (due to demand for natural gas) and nuclear power. However, there are regulatory nuances to navigate, as well a need to separate hype from substance. We believe active managers that are acutely focused on infrastructure markets are well positioned to identify true beneficiaries.
Data centers are a key driver of power demand
From 2023 to 2030, the power demands of U.S. data centers are projected to quadruple, according to a McKinsey study (Exhibit 2). In another study, Goldman Sachs estimates that data centers will make up 11.5% of total power demand by 2030, up from just 3% today. This demand will require well over $50 billion of capital investment in U.S. power generation capacity. We also expect tens of billions of dollars in transmission and related grid investments to support reliability and connect new generation to customers.
EXHIBIT 2
U.S. data center power demand to quadruple by 2030
U.S. data center energy consumption (Terawatt hours)

At September 1, 2024. Source: McKinsey & Company.
There is an arms race among hyperscalers to build and monetize AI models. (“Hyperscalers” are large technology companies that operate extensive global networks of data centers, providing significant cloud computing capabilities and services.) AI workloads, across both training and inference, require significantly more computational power than non-AI applications.
We therefore expect robust hyperscaler capital expenditures to build and maintain AI models, and we believe that U.S. hyperscaler power demand will grow by more than 50 GW by the early 2030s. To put this into context, 50 GW could power approximately 50 million homes. Longer term, the ability of hyperscalers to monetize these models will be key to sustaining growth. Further, the ability of utilities and developers to meet this demand remains an open question.
Growth in power consumption is not just a U.S. phenomenom. We expect global power demand to rise nearly 30% by end of the decade.
Large manufacturers will also require more generation
It’s not just data centers driving higher demand. Onshoring of energy- intensive activities, such as precision manufacturing, will play a significant role in power demand growth over time, particularly in the United States.
The Inflation Reduction Act, the CHIPS and Science Act, and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act introduced significant incentives that are driving manufacturing investment in the United States. When coupled with existing deglobalization trends, which accelerated when the pandemic revealed the challenges of complex global supply chains, we expect rising energy demand from manufacturing.
We are already seeing this play out. Total construction spending on manufacturing has roughly tripled in the past three years, according to data from the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank (Exhibit 3). And many utilities are investing in new resources to meet the needs of factories being built in their service territories.
EXHIBIT 3
Manufacturing construction has surged amid onshoring, incentives
Total construction spending ($ millions)

At July 1, 2024. Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, U.S. Census Bureau.
Electrification creates long-term opportunities
Another driver of higher electricity demand is the increasing internet-of- things economy, including the adoption of electric appliances globally, coupled with the growing number of electric vehicles (EVs) on the road. Bloomberg estimates that global passenger EV sales will climb to 73 million in 2040, up from less than 15 million in 2023.
Global electric appliance adoption is expected to double in the next 10 years (an 8% compound annual growth rate), according to Precedence Research (Exhbit 4).
EXHIBIT 4
Growing electric appliance adoption driving power demand
Global household appliance market size (USD billion)

At September 1, 2024. Source: Precedence Research.
Electricity demand impacts several infrastructure businesses
Accelerating electricity demand will have significant implications for listed infrastructure. We see several infrastructure businesses focused on this theme:

1. Utilities will be critical in meeting surging power demand
The demand for electricity is growing faster than the grid can handle, presenting both challenges and opportunities for utilities.
Many utilities have revised annualized demand growth forecasts higher. For example, a large utility in the southeast expects power demand in its service territory to increase by around 9% annually from 2025 through 2028 (up from ~0.5% annual growth), with data centers accounting for 80% of that growth.
As data centers look poised to consume a larger share of total generation, concerns have emerged about rate design—specifically, that residential customers might end up subsidizing data centers’ power bills, an outcome that could be unacceptable to utility regulators.
Further, several utilities have indicated they simply can’t keep up with potential customer needs for power, and there are long lead times to build both new generation and transmission in many areas. This is causing data centers to explore alternative solutions, away from regulated markets. Constraints across the power and utility value chain could hinder supply.
We also have to recognize the likelihood of substantial “double counting” in reported utility data center pipelines. We believe that data centers are submitting interconnection requests to multiple utilities at once, hoping to obtain the fastest possible time to power.
Overall, the market views rate design and supply chain risks as manageable for now. Optimism about data centers and other demand drivers—as well as lower interest rates—has helped drive the S&P 500 Utilities index to a nearly 20% return this year (through August), slightly ahead of the full S&P return of 19.5%.
However, it is important to distinguish between independent power producers (IPPs), fully regulated utilities, and integrated utilities (regulated utilities that also operate unregulated generation).
EXHIBIT 5
Power and utility business models

At September 30, 2024. Source: Cohen & Steers, Bloomberg.
2. Natural gas demand expected to benefit midstream energy companies
Hyperscalers have generally committed to investing in clean energy. Microsoft, for instance, just signed a $10 billion agreement with a renewable development company to provide wind and solar power to meet the tech giant’s increasing energy demands.
The challenge we see is that solar and wind are not as reliable as traditional baseload resources (~30% capacity factors vs. 80–99%), creating intermittency challenges for data centers that need constant power. Alternative energy such as wind, solar and battery storage will continue to grow, but natural gas (and nuclear power) will remain critical due to its established infrastructure and reliability.
In fact, Goldman Sachs estimates that through 2030, 60% of the incremental power demand from data centers will be met with natural gas, while alternatives will meet the remaining 40%.
The need for gas-fired generation to support higher power demand creates significant opportunities for midstream energy companies that own and operate natural gas pipelines.
We believe the data center opportunity could drive up to 10 billion cubic feet per day of incremental gas demand by 2030, which would require more than $10 billion of high-return, incremental investment in capacity expansions and laterals on existing systems. That has prompted us to increase our long-term annual growth rate expectation for natural gas demand to 2%, from zero previously.
Natural gas is significantly cleaner than coal and oil but much more reliable than wind and solar.
3. Nuclear power will be part of the solution
We believe that existing—and potentially new—nuclear power assets will also be part of the solution to meet rising electricity demand.
Energy security concerns, higher power demand and continued challenges associated with the intermittency of renewables are leading to a nuclear renaissance. Consumers and policymakers generally view nuclear as a clean and reliable energy source. Notably, the Inflation Reduction Act included $6 billion for nuclear energy production.
That said, new nuclear construction is difficult in developed economies with stringent permitting and approval processes, especially given its long history of cost overruns and substantial construction timeline delays.
Regulated utilities are hesitant to invest in new nuclear without explicit regulatory or government guarantees given the large investments with only a regulated rate of return would likely be viewed as an untenable risk by shareholders and credit rating agencies.
Our expectation is that existing nuclear plants will see their lives extended, and startup companies will work to lower costs on small modular reactors (SMRs). We’ll see whether cost declines happen, but we believe that the existing nuclear fleet is far more valuable than investors appreciated just a few years ago.
To that point, Constellation Energy recently announced the restart of the Crane Clean Energy Center in Pennsylvania (formerly Three Mile Island Unit 1), with a 20-year agreement to sell power to Microsoft. This follows a similar agreement between Talen Energy and Amazon, where Talen’s Susquehanna nuclear plant will help Amazon Web Services meet their clean energy goals. While these types of transactions will face regulatory scrutiny, other similarly structured contracts are being explored as one solution to meet rising electricity demand.
We therefore see opportunities for integrated utilities and IPPs with deregulated nuclear generation to contract directly with data centers, driving higher and more sustainable earnings power and cash flows.
Power demand is part of a favorable backdrop for infrastructure
Overall, though continued regulatory support for investment remains critical, rising power demand is simply part of a wider backdrop that we believe is favorable for listed infrastructure.
For one, listed infrastructure valuations are attractive. Infrastructure trades at a rare discount to global equities and at a steep markdown to historical relative multiples.
We also believe we are entering a macro environment that favors infrastructure. The asset class has historically produced favorable absolute and relative returns in periods of slowing growth and greater-than- expected inflation.
With the global economy shifting into a lower gear, and amid generally more dovish central bank policies, infrastructure’s appeal is compelling.
FURTHER READING

3 Reasons to own global listed infrastructure today
Attractive valuations, an advantageous macro environment and high private investor interest set the stage for potentially strong total returns from listed infrastructure.

Capital Market Assumptions
Expected returns for the next 10 years amid elevated inflation and resilient global growth

What could a second Trump presidency mean for real assets?
Market reaction indicates investors are expecting higher inflation, deregulation, lower taxes and winners and losers in key sectors such as energy and infrastructure.
Index Definitions and important disclosures
Data quoted represents past performance, which is no guarantee of future results. This material is for informational purposes and reflects prevailing conditions and our judgment as of this date, which are subject to change. There is no guarantee that any market forecast set forth in this presentation will be realized. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific point in time and should not be relied upon as investment advice, does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell a security or other investment and is not intended to predict or depict performance of any investment.
The S&P 500 Utilities Index comprises those companies included in the S&P 500 that are classified as members of the GICS utilities sector. Independent power producers, Integrated utilities and Fully regulated utilities YTD total shareholder returns measured by Cohen & Steers custom benchmarks identified as sub-sectors of the S&P 500 Utilities Index.
This material is not being provided in a fiduciary capacity and is not intended to recommend any investment policy or investment strategy or take into account the specific objectives or circumstances of any investor. We consider the information in this presentation to be accurate, but we do not represent that it is complete or should be relied upon as the sole source of appropriateness for investment. Please consult with your investment, tax or legal professional regarding your individual circumstances prior to investing.
Active management does not ensure a profit or guarantee to protect against a loss and actively managed strategies may underperform passively managed strategies.
Risks of Investing in global infrastructure securities. Infrastructure issuers may be subject to regulation by various governmental authorities and may also be affected by governmental regulation of rates charged to customers, operational or other mishaps, tariffs, and changes in tax laws, regulatory policies, and accounting standards. Foreign securities involve special risks, including currency fluctuation and lower liquidity. Some global securities may represent small and medium-sized companies, which may be more susceptible to price volatility than larger companies. No representation or warranty is made as to the efficacy of any particular strategy or fund or to the actual returns that may be achieved.
Risks of Investing in Energy: Investing involves risk, including entire loss of capital invested. There can be no assurance that the investment strategy will meet its investment objectives. Diversification is not guaranteed to ensure a profit or protect against loss. The portfolio will be subject to more risks related to the energy sector than if the portfolio were more broadly diversified over numerous sectors of the economy. A downturn in the energy sector of the economy could have a larger impact on the portfolio than on an investment company that does not concentrate in the sector. Investments within the energy industry may be highly volatile due to significant fluctuation in the prices of energy commodities as well as political and regulatory developments.
Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. (Cohen & Steers) is a U.S. registered investment advisory firm that provides investment management services to corporate retirement, public and union retirement plans, endowments, foundations and mutual funds. Cohen & Steers U.S. registered open-end funds are distributed by Cohen & Steers Securities, LLC and are only available to U.S. residents. Cohen & Steers Asia Limited is authorized and regulated by the Securities
and Futures Commission of Hong Kong (ALZ367). Cohen & Steers Japan Limited is a registered financial instruments operator (investment advisory and agency business and discretionary investment management business with the Financial Services Agency of Japan and the Kanto Local Finance Bureau No. 3157) and is a member of the Japan Investment Advisers Association. Cohen & Steers UK Limited is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FRN458459). Cohen & Steers Ireland Limited is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland (No.C188319). Cohen & Steers Singapore Private Limited is a private company limited by shares in the Republic of Singapore.
For recipients in the Middle East: This document is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute or form part of any marketing initiative, any offer to issue or sell, or any solicitation of any offer to subscribe or purchase, any products, strategies or other services, nor shall it or the fact of its distribution form the basis of, or be relied on in connection with, any contract resulting therefrom. In the event that the recipient of this document wishes to receive further information with regard to any products, strategies or other services, it shall specifically request the same in writing from us.