Macro factor sensitivities in listed infrastructure

Macro factor sensitivities in listed infrastructure

Macro factor sensitivities in listed infrastructure

Benjamin Morton

Benjamin Morton

Head of Global Infrastructure

More by this author
John Muth

John Muth

Macro Strategist

More by this author

30 minute read

September 2022

Share

Sign up to get our insights
Subscribe

We examine performance characteristics across various market environments, providing a framework for understanding how listed infrastructure may fit into a broader asset allocation strategy and offering insight into the role of macroeconomic research in Cohen & Steers’ active investment process.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Differentiated behavior in growth and inflation regimes
    Infrastructure has historically exhibited counter-cyclical behavior, offering equity-like returns over full market cycles, but with the potential for significant downside protection in defensive environments. Such periods are characterized by business cycle slowdowns (late cycle/recession), stagflation or inflationary conditions.
  • Variety of subsectors within the asset class offer opportunities in most climates
    Listed infrastructure historically has positive absolute returns in virtually all environments except during recessions. While infrastructure generally trails equities in risk-on environments, typically characterized by early/mid-cycle recoveries and low-inflation periods, certain subsectors typically perform well in those environments.
  • Macro outlook plays a key role in our portfolio construction process
    We rank and allocate to subsectors according to their favorability in the context of our current macro views, which we then combine with high conviction stock positions to build our portfolios. Based on where we are currently in each of the macro regimes discussed in this paper, we believe infrastructure is poised to maintain an attractive return profile going forward.

Executive summary

Asset class observations

The global economy has entered a new regime characterized by lower growth, higher inflation, higher interest rates and a movement away from significant oversupply and accommodative policies. Though navigating a new landscape may be challenging, we have seen and traversed regime shifts before.

We examined listed infrastructure’s performance relative to global equities in different macroeconomic environments since 1973, the earliest that reliable data is available. Based on these frameworks and our analysis of current economic conditions, we believe infrastructure is positioned to perform well versus broad global equities into 2023 as inflation persists and growth slows.

  • Infrastructure has exhibited counter-cyclical behavior, offering equity-like returns over full market cycles, but with the potential for meaningful downside protection in defensive environments. Such periods are characterized by business cycle slowdowns (late cycle/recession), stagflation (defined here as when growth misses and inflation beats expectations), and medium- and high-inflation environments.
  • By contrast, infrastructure generally lagged equities in positive economic environments, particularly in early- and mid-cycle recoveries, and when growth and inflation both surprised to the upside.
  • Infrastructure had positive absolute returns in virtually all environments, except during recessions. However, recessions have been the periods of infrastructure’s greatest outperformance relative to equities.
We anticipate being in business cycle and inflation environments that favor infrastructure moving forward, based on our current views of economic growth and inflation outright and versus consensus market pricing.

Subsector observations

While infrastructure subsectors frequently performed as expected in a given regime, we observed certain patterns stemming from idiosyncratic factors in particular subsectors (though they may not be repeated in the future).

  • Utilities (electric, gas and water) exhibited clear defensive properties, typically outperforming equities during recessions, stagnation and high- inflation environments.
  • Transportation services (airports, toll roads and marine ports) were often more economically sensitive than other infrastructure subsectors and were among the only subsectors not to outperform equities during recessions.
  • Telecom infrastructure (cell towers), measured by a custom index starting in 1998, significantly outperformed the overall infrastructure universe and other subsectors, impacting the pattern and magnitude of results in this study. We believe this was due largely to secular industry drivers that at times superseded the effect of macro factors. Consequently, the results in this report may not reflect the more defensive characteristics that we would typically expect from these businesses going forward.
  • Rails have historically been among the most economically sensitive subsectors in the infrastructure universe. We believe results showing outperformance in down cycles are likely uncharacteristic of typical behavior due to structural changes to the group that have supported strong performance over the past two decades.
  • Midstream energy (pipelines) exhibited counter-cyclical patterns, although we note that fast-rising shale production in North America has significantly influenced performance since the late 2000s. We believe midstream energy companies should generally be somewhat agnostic to external macroeconomic drivers.
How-to-use-this-report

Business cycles

Amid an uncertain macroeconomic backdrop, we believe global listed infrastructure should attract increased investor interest as an alternative source of performance due to the asset class’s performance characteristics and historically attractive full-cycle returns.

Relative performance vs. equities

  • In the period we studied, infrastructure generally outperformed equities in late-cycle phases, which often coincided with slowing growth and rising inflation pressures as capacity constraints took hold.
  • Infrastructure also outperformed in recessionary periods, on average, with water utilities exhibiting particularly strong relative performance.
  • Telecoms did better in early/mid-cycle periods.
  • Mid-cycle periods were modestly less favorable for infrastructure.
EXHIBIT 1
Business cycle regimes—excess total returns vs. equities, annualized

February 1973–December 2021

Ex-1_Business cycle regimes_excess total returns vs equities annualized
Ex-1a_Business cycle regimes_excess total returns vs equities annualized

Absolute performance

  • Infrastructure had positive returns, on average, during all three expansion phases.
  • Unsurprisingly, infrastructure underperformed its long-run average during recessionary periods.
  • Rails generated positive overall returns in recessions, an uncommon characteristic for assets with economic sensitivity.
  • The underperformance of telecoms in recessions was surprising, but outliers and a small sample set may be the reasons. We expect the subsector to display more defensive characteristics going forward.
EXHIBIT 2
Business cycle regimes—total returns, annualized

February 1973–December 2021

Ex-2_Business cycle regimes_total returns annualized
Ex-2b_Business cycle regimes_total returns annualized_B

Growth and inflation surprises

There were few “safe havens” in the first half of 2022, as most equities reacted to rapidly accelerating inflation and increased recession risk amid sharp interest-rate hikes. Infrastructure was a notable exception, in keeping with historical trends.

Relative performance vs. equities

  • In the cycles we analyzed, infrastructure showed relative outperformance during periods of slower-than-expected growth and greater-than-expected inflation.
  • “Good” inflation, resulting from economic growth and rising demand, generally favors transportation services (such as freight rails and marine ports).
  • Persistently high inflation in times of surprisingly slower growth (falling demand) tends to be “bad” inflation but nevertheless favors infrastructure generally.
  • Rails tend to act defensively within the industrial transportation space during slowdowns.
  • Rails have demonstrated significant pricing power in times of rising inflation due to their monopolistic characteristics and role as an essential service provider to shippers.
EXHIBIT 3
Growth and inflation surprise regimes—excess total returns vs. equities, annualized

January 1979–June 2022

Ex-3_Growth and inflation surprise regimes_excess total returns vs equities annualized
Ex-3b_Growth and inflation surprise regimes_excess total returns vs equities annualized

Absolute performance

  • U.S. and global utilities present a clear picture of favorable, though somewhat muted, returns in positive-growth-surprise environments.
  • When growth surprised to the downside, utilities uniformly outperformed.
  • Counterintuitively, transportation services globally showed better performance and hit rates in negative-growth-surprise environments, while lagging in positive-growth-surprise environments.
EXHIBIT 4
Growth and inflation surprise regimes—total returns, annualized

January 1979–June 2022

Ex-4_Growth and inflation surprise regimes_total returns annualized
Ex-4b_Growth and inflation surprise regimes_total returns annualized

Inflation levels

Infrastructure values have historically held up better than the broad equity market in medium- and high-inflation periods, given the companies’ inflation-linked pricing models and generally inelastic demand for infrastructure services.

Relative performance vs. equities

  • Returns during medium- and high-inflation environments are favorable, with an outsized average annual return under medium-inflation conditions.
  • Infrastructure underperformed in low-inflation environments.
  • In the prior cycle, inflation remained at a low level for an extended period. We expect inflation in the current cycle to remain elevated.
EXHIBIT 5
Inflation level regimes—excess total returns vs. equities, annualized

February 1973–June 2022

Ex-5_Inflation level regimes_excess total returns vs equities annualized
Ex-5a_Inflation level regimes_excess total returns vs equities annualized

Absolute performance

  • For idiosyncratic reasons (not likely to be repeated with the business model currently in use), midstream energy does not show up as an outperformer relative to other subsectors, at any level of inflation.
  • However, among infrastructure subsectors, we expect midstream to have the most sensitivity to absolute levels of inflation going forward.
  • Asia travel & tourism was less responsive than other sectors to medium and high U.S. inflation.

Methodology (Exhibits 5–6)

  • Historical analysis of infrastructure performance since 1973, conditioning on headline U.S. consumer inflation relative to its long-term average.
  • Low inflation (<2.4% headline CPI): 194 of 582 months (33%)
  • Medium inflation (2.4%–3.9% CPI): 194 of 582 months (33%)
  • High inflation (>3.9% CPI): 194 of 582 months (33%)
  • See Exhibit 8c for timeline of inflation regimes used in this analysis.
EXHIBIT 6
Inflation level regimes—total returns, annualized

February 1973–June 2022

Ex-6_Inflation level regimes_total returns annualized
Ex-6a_Inflation level regimes_total returns annualized

The case for active management

Listed infrastructure represents a diverse opportunity set that has historically produced a wide dispersion of subsector returns in any given period depending on economic drivers. Anticipating such trends is a key component of active management, and active managers of listed infrastructure have consistently demonstrated a track record of delivering value for investors (Exhibit 7).

Managers may capitalize on distinct economically driven sector characteristics as well as secular trends (such as clean energy initiatives or increasing data intensity with the adoption of 5G technology). Active managers may also take advantage of pricing anomalies that occur due to changes in interest rates and other technical drivers, or from shifting regulatory and political factors.

By contrast, passive portfolios are unable to allocate assets to capitalize on macro factor or secular growth opportunities. Nor can they sidestep sectors that may be facing headwinds. (Of course, there is no guarantee that active management can successfully navigate these trends.)

EXHIBIT 7
Active management has provided a source of alpha

Relative performance of global active listed infrastructure managers versus benchmark(a)

Annualized outperformance

Appendix

Timelines of the examined regimes

The charts below display the rolling 12-month excess returns of listed infrastructure relative to global equities across the macro environments examined in this presentation.

EXHIBIT 8a
Business cycle phases (see Exhibits 1 & 2)

January 1974–December 2021, monthly data

Ex-8a Business cycle phases
EXHIBIT 8b
Growth & inflation surprises (see Exhibits 3 & 4)

January 1979–June 2022, quarterly data

Ex-8b_Growth and inflation surprises
EXHIBIT 8c
Inflation levels (see Exhibits 5 & 6)

January 1974–June 2022, monthly data

Ex-8c Inflation levels
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Author Profile Picture

Benjamin Morton, Executive Vice President, is Head of Global Infrastructure and a senior portfolio manager for Cohen & Steers’ infrastructure portfolios, including those focused on master limited partnerships.

Author Profile Picture

John Muth, Senior Vice President, is the firm’s Macro Strategist responsible for global economic outlooks and macro research across the firm.

2409614